Quid Pro Quo
Sexual Harassment Lawyer
Quid pro quo sexual harassment means,
“This for that.”
Quid pro quo is a Latin phrase.
Examples of quid pro quo sexual harassment scenarios include:
- A boss, manager, or supervisor conditions employment on the employee’s willingness to be sexually harassed. In order to be a victim of quid pro quo sexual harassment it is not necessary that the employee engage in sexual conduct with the harasser. The victim of quid pro quo sexual harassment may tolerate sexually inappropriate jokes, comments, or leers. Merely not saying anything to object to the sexually offensive conduct, and then experiencing adverse job consequences upon objecting may constitute a quid pro quo sexually hostile work environment.
The sexual harasser may condition any employment benefit on the sexual harassment victim’s tolerance of the sexual harassment. Employment benefits include the obvious such as raises, promotions, and the ability to keep one’s job. However, employment benefits also include not being put under the microscope, and not being written up for trivial issues. The assignment of work is also an employment benefit. When the victim of sexual harassment stops tolerating the sexual harassment they may find their job assignments more undesirable, the assignment of work uneven, or assignment of sales leads (if the employee is in sales) become worse than before.
We advance court cost. All cases are taken on contingency. We are only paid if we win!
(877) 525-0700
Quid pro quo sexual harassment does not require there is an initial period of the sexual harassment victim going along with the sexual harassment. If the sexual harassment victim never tolerated the quid pro quo sexual harassment, and they were subjected to adverse job consequences they may have a case of quid pro quo sexual harassment.
If you experienced verbal or physical sexual harassment not necessarily linked to job benefits you may still have a case for sexual harassment. Click here to read about other forms of sexual harassment.worklawyerca.com/sexual-harassment-lawyer-los-angeles/
- The victim of quid pro quo sexual harassment is retaliated against when the sexual harasser realizes they will not go along with the campaign of quid pro quo sexual harassment. During the initial stages of sexual harassment many employees do not make a lot of noise and clearly indicate their objections to the sexually hostile work environment. The sexual harassment victim may be unsure what is going on, or afraid to say anything.
At a certain point it becomes clear to the victim of sexual harassment the conduct is sexual harassment opposed to their imagination, or a potential misinterpretation. The victim of sexual harassment may become empowered to complain due to a recent sexual harassment training, the support of other employees, or the elevation of the campaign of sexual harassment into a more severe format.
In quid pro quo sexual harassment, or sexual harassment retaliation cases based on other theories of sexual harassment, once the victim of sexual harassment has complained to management, or participated in a sexual harassment investigation the harasser treats the employee differently. All of the sudden the employee is subject to super scrutiny. If they come in a few minutes late they are written up. Promises of a raise or job promotion stop.
Sometimes the victim of sexual harassment has not actually complained about the sexual harassment, but it has become known to the harasser the victim is not interested in the sexually offensive conduct. Once this occurs any decent treatment of the victim of the harassment stops.
Who Engages In Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment?
Although quid pro quo sexual harassment usually infers somebody with authority is engaging in the sexually hostile conduct it is possible a coworker could engage in quid pro quo sexual harassment. A coworker may create a hostile work environment in which comments are made about women, they touch women, or otherwise verbally harass based upon sex. If the coworker finds a way to make the employee’s job miserable if they object to the sexually hostile work environment they created that may be quid pro quo sexual harassment. However, if it is a sexually hostile work environment the coworker created it is actionable as sexual harassment if the conduct was known by a supervisor, or manager, or it did not stop after it was complained about to a supervisor or manager.
Coworkers can be involved in a hostile quid pro quo work environment along with a person of authority such as a manager. The coworker may be equally engaged in offensive sexual harassment along with a manager. The coworker may assist the boss or supervisor in their campaign of sexual harassment. Coworkers can also assist mangers and persons of authority in retaliating against an employee who objects to sexual harassment, or refuses to go along with it.
With all forms of sexual harassment it is less important what label is put on the sexual harassment than an inquiry be made by an experienced sexual harassment lawyer into whether the conduct amounts to sexual harassment. Quid pro quo sexual harassment is only one type of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is also illegal if many sexually harassment comments are made, or there is physical touching without it being clear job benefits are conditioned on the victim’s willingness to tolerate the sexual harassment.
Sexual Harassment Articles
If you have any questions about sexual harassment conduct our experienced California sexual harassment attorneys at (877) 525-0700.
Sexual Harassment Case Results of Karl Gerber:
- $797,712 Present Cash Value for Ontario Sexual Harassmentby Manager
- $568,480 Present Cash Value for Reseda Sexual Harassmentby Manager
- $373,265 Present Cash Value for El Monte Sexual Harassmentby Supervisor
- $295,609 Present Cash Value for Light Sexual Harassment by Manager
- $289,462 Present Cash Value Camarillo Sexual HarassmentBoss Touching and Comment Case Settlement
- $226,302 Present Cash Value for Sexual Harassment of a Sylmar Clerical Worker
- $225,000 Panorama City Customer Sexual Harassmentin 2014
- $200,000 Van Nuys Executive Sexual Harassmentin 2014
- $183,540 Present Cash Value of Sexual Harassment of 18 Year Old Part-Time Worker
- $176,757 Present Cash Value for Sexual Harassment of Sylmar Printing Employee
- $165,000 Camarillo Sexual Harassmentby Manager in 2014
Our Firm: No upfront fees or costs
Contingency Fee Representation
All employment cases for employees are taken on a contingency basis. We are only paid a fee when and if we win your case, and we advance all litigation costs. Our goal is to make expert legal representation accessible to every hardworking employee.
Serving Santa Clara County
We have proudly served all of Santa Clara County since 1993.
The Employment Lawyers Group has successfully handled
2,000+
Separate California Employment Cases
Media Engagements
Sample Case Results
Employment Case
$18,402,868
Jury verdict for male visually harassed and subject to crude comments by a female manager
breach of commission contract
$1,150,000
Unpaid commissions of two plaintiffs
unpaid wages
$875,000
For 4 oil field service industry workers whose times worked were not recorded on timesheets and were on-call
Disclaimer: These results are based on the facts of these specific cases and do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.
Practice Areas
Discrimination
Age, Disability, Family Medical Leave (FMLA/CFRA), Gender, National Origin, Pregnancy, Race, and Sexual Orientation claims.
Unpaid Wages & Overtime
Recovering earnings for Overtime, Bonuses, Commissions, Meal & Rest Breaks, and Prevailing Wage violations.
Sexual Harassment
Compassionate and effective representation for victims of sexual harassment and hostile work environment claims.
Wrongful Termination
Representing employees terminated in violation of public policy, contracts, or California and Federal law.
Leaves & Retaliation
Protecting employees who face adverse actions after reporting illegal activity or taking protected medical leave.
Whistleblowers
Advocating for employees who report fraud, waste, or abuse in their organizations under whistleblower protections.
Our California Locations
Bakersfield
5401 Business Park S, #214,
Bakersfield CA 93309
Sacramento
777 Campus Commons Rd, #200,
Sacramento CA 95825
San Francisco
524 Union St, #400,
San Francisco CA 94133
Additional Sites
About Firm Founder, Karl Gerber
Firm Founder, Karl Gerber, has been an employment wrongful termination attorney since 1993. He has represented a wide range of employees throughout California.
Mr. Gerber has won 51 of the binding arbitrations and jury trials he first chaired, and a number of his appeals are published. This deep trial experience is the foundation of the firm's strategic approach to litigation.
The employment attorneys employed by the Employment Lawyers Group have worked at the firm well in excess of five years, have also tried many different labor cases, and have all been extensively trained on employment wrongful termination by Karl Gerber.
Ready to Discuss Your Case?
Your rights as an employee matter. Contact us for a free, confidential case review.
Prefer to speak directly?
Call Us: (877) 525-0700